Polymarket Win Rate Leaderboard: A More Reliable Alternative

Polyfollow does not publish the old snapshot-derived win-rate field as if it were a complete historical record. This list instead ranks profitable traders with at least 50 observed trades by a population-relative quality score.

Why this is not a raw win-rate ranking

Polyfollow previously stored a percentage derived from current positions, not a complete history of closed positions. That snapshot could collapse many wallets to 0% or 100%, so we removed it rather than label it as a reliable historical win rate. The list below is ordered by the quality score shown on every row.

Polymarket's official leaderboard API documents rank, wallet, volume, and P&L—not win rate. Its closed-positions endpoint is separate, wallet-specific, and paginated. A defensible win-rate product would need a published win definition, complete history, and explicit treatment of partial exits and multi-outcome markets.

Official leaderboard response fields Official closed-positions endpoint

Traders with no trades in the last 21 days are listed after the active ones.

Rankings as of Oct 27, 2026 (UTC). Live data loads in your browser.

Research Before You Copy

Polyfollow can mirror selected Polymarket traders into your account automatically. Review each public profile and choose risk limits before copying. Not sure who to pick? Start with our curated guide to the best Polymarket traders to follow.

Start Copying

Polymarket Win Rate Leaderboard: A More Reliable Alternative FAQ

Why does Polyfollow not rank Polymarket traders by win rate?

Polyfollow removed its previous win-rate field because it came from a current-position snapshot rather than a complete closed-position history. That could make a flat wallet appear to have a 0% win rate or a wallet with currently profitable open positions appear to have 100%. We do not present that snapshot as a historical win percentage.

Does Polymarket publish an official trader win rate?

Polymarket’s public leaderboard response includes rank, wallet, trading volume, and P&L, but not a win-rate field. Its Data API separately exposes paginated closed positions for one wallet. A comparable historical win rate still requires a defined win rule and complete per-wallet history; Polyfollow does not currently publish that calculation.

How is the Polyfollow quality score calculated?

The score is population-relative and runs from 0 to 100. It weights relative all-time P&L at 40%, positive recent momentum at 25%, consistency across all-time, 30-day, and 7-day P&L plus profit concentration at 20%, and trade-count experience at 15%. This leaderboard also requires at least 50 observed trades.

Does a high quality score guarantee profitable copy trading?

No. The score summarizes observed historical data and changes as the tracked population and trader results change. It does not predict future outcomes, prove skill in a specific market, or guarantee that copied orders will execute at the same price or make a profit.

How should I evaluate a Polymarket trader without win rate?

Open the trader profile and compare all-time, 30-day, and 7-day P&L, trade count, current positions, recent trades, concentration, markets traded, and copy risk. Use the quality score as a discovery signal rather than a decision by itself.

About This Leaderboard

This leaderboard includes profitable traders with at least 50 observed trades and orders them by Polyfollow quality score, not by a fabricated win percentage. The 0–100 score is relative to the tracked trader population, so a score can change when performance or the comparison set changes.

The score weights relative all-time P&L (40%), positive recent momentum (25%), consistency across all-time, 30-day, and 7-day P&L plus profit concentration (20%), and trade-count experience (15%). It is a research aid—not a prediction, recommendation, or guarantee of future copy-trading results.